While all art historians aim to  continuously engage with the visual world, I have a particularly strong  awareness of my reliance on vision as an art historian because of a  serious genetic retinal degenerative disease that runs in my family.   Growing up with a visually impaired mother who is also an activist for  disability rights, I have always been aware of the struggles and  limitations that people with disabilities face on a daily basis.  In the  last few years as I have laid the foundation for my career in art  history, I have become increasingly aware of the utter inaccessibility  of the art world to the visually impaired.  While specific branches of  law are responsible for the progression of disability rights, the  process of accessibility reform is slow and seems to be far removed from  the art community.  I feel that steps need to be taken to create  awareness in the art community about the serious accessibility problems  our field faces as a series of practices that revolve entirely around  vision.
As  an extra-curricular project I have taken on the task of documenting the  effectiveness of the accommodations for the visually impaired at the  most prominent art-related American institutions.    I believe strongly in  collaboration and discussion as the foundation of successful pedagogical  method, and therefore feel that as an educator, art historian, and  someone with ties to the visually impaired community, I have a  responsibility to help make the art historical conversation more  accessible.  My goal is to produce an in-depth study and comparison of  the disability accommodations in the U.S., specifically contrasting my  results with many of the prominent institutions in Europe.  This study  could eventually contribute to the designing of a standardized format  that would apply across museums and other exhibits to ensure access to  everyone.  The project has two goals: The first is to compile  comprehensive data on the current state of art accessibility to the  visually impaired in the U.S.  The second is to demonstrate feasible  solutions to accessibility problems by holding a local exhibition that  features multi-sensory art objects.  In the last few decades art  practices that revolve around tactile, auditory, and phenomenological  elements have found their way into the art historical canon; however,  they are mainly revered for their conceptual value, as opposed to their  inclusive significance.  Creating an exhibition that demonstrates the  diverse methods employed by contemporary artists to branch out of the  visual realm and utilizes feasible curatorial methods to ensure  accessibility would help set a precedent for accessibility reform in  American art institutions.  It would also send an important message to  the visually impaired community that engagement with art objects is not  limited to the sighted.   It is a common assumption that the visual  nature of art as it has existed for centuries necessarily excludes this  segment of the population.  With the development of new technologies and  the recent history of new media art, this is no longer the case.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment